I have always been a social person. As a child, I made friends and fostered relationships like a regular kid. As a teenager, I was more reserved but was still able to relate and converse. As an adult, I have always been selective. One thing I have always been terrible at was maintaining long-distance relationships. I didn’t write letters and was leery of opening myself up to rejection by reaching out to others. So, the internet was something akin to a personality reformat. I could reach out and, although I could be rejected, I found that few people would do that to me. I was able to re-connect with old friends, deepen current friendships and foster new ones. It was no wonder that they began to refer to the new internet, Web 2.0, as Social Media.

          Social Media is a term coined to explain certain aspects of technology that allow and encourage interaction. Whether you are commenting on a site or leaving a message on a forum or chatting live, you are interacting with a static technology that invites this activity. Social Media has done for the world what the telephone once did for families. Social Media has made the world smaller through connectivity on a level as superficial as ‘Money Making schemes’ to ‘I have lost my husband.’ It galvanizes entire communities and a prayer chain or positive intention is only as weak as the number of retweets. 

          As a writer and blogger, I readily take advantage of all forms of connection that the Web provides. I am easily led on Twitter and have been known to accept a friend on FaceBook that holds a very tenuous connection to me as long as their profile pic is not genitalia. What can I say? A girl has to have standards. So imagine my surprise that people were using this miracle of technology for evil instead of good. Many people are capitalizing on what I call, Anti-Social Media.

There are people on the interwebz who have no qualms about attacking a person. These Social Media Snipers take aim at individuals when they are vulnerable and attack until they have chummed the waters enough to start a feeding frenzy. All of a sudden, a person’s crisis becomes a poll on Soda Head and fodder for blog posts, status updates and e-zine articles. All of a sudden, you need to take sides on whether a person was careless or responsible for a death or cruel or just plain stupid. And the most disgusting part of these incidents is that the person in crisis, who is all of a sudden immersed in a drama, is lost in the argument, while the Sniper gets the attention.

They are the shock jocks of this new technology. They are the pseudo famous for being out-spoken and willing to voice the inappropriate things you may only think of. They are the serial killers who obtain fame by using pain and no one remembers the victims. These Snipers are nothing but Technological Bullies. We accept this the way we dismiss bullying in general. We say things like, kids are cruel and we ignore the detrimental effects of harsh words, embarrassment and general emotional torture.

          In my previous incarnation, I was a therapist. In my career I worked with pedophiles, domestic violence, addiction, families and relationships. I saw and heard of violence of all kinds. The stories I would hear were so vile that I often needed over an hour to decompress after work such that the images would subside to the point that I could attend to my family. You would think this would desensitize me to what is considered to be mild annoyances like a stranger saying negative things to someone in 140 characters or less. On the contrary, I am more sensitive to even the mildest forms of violence and these anti-social media attacks are tantamount to assault. These Social Media Snipers are invading people’s computers, phones and homes with their vitriol and feigned disgust. This is a home invasion by a faceless coward that can sit in their sweats 3000 miles away who likes to play judge, jury and executioner with the smugness of a vestal virgin.

          Social Media has created a new form of celebrity that is measured not by paparazzi pics or magazine covers but by Google and Alexa. This so-called celebrity can be obtained through hard work, good writing and diligent networking. Instead, some choose to be the hare and race to the lime light by being negatively outspoken, contrary and abusive.

          What is our reaction to these vultures? Some of us write. Some of us ignore. Some of us attack. What is clear is that these tactics do not work. We are not ameliorating the need for others to act with a viciousness only seen in the scorned. On the contrary, the attention they receive has been like a siren call to any and all fame whore. And if not on the level of the shamefully self-serving acts of a would be author a little less than a year ago, we have others who find no qualms talking smack and gossiping on live feeds of other people in the same business.

          They call us the New Journalists and yet we have no concept of the ethics it takes to do that job. It’s like stepping into an office and being a therapist because people tell you their problems all the time. We have stepped into the shoes of people like Bernstein and Woodward with the ethics of a wayward priest. We are somehow under the impression that using the Web to spout hate or create pretend political campaigns which are truly fronts for bigotry (see Andrew Shirvell) is our right.  Freedom of speech gives one the right to say anything they want along with the responsibility of the consequences those words may create.

          Social Media needs to come to an understanding. We all need to join groups like Blogging with Integrity to avoid the ugliness that has been our unfortunate history. We must all pledge to disavow any and all bullying and, while we are at it, we must stop using such an infantile word. Bullying is violence. Period. We must stop posturing and attacking and judging and shutting others out because that’s what we do in real life. We must remember that no one is making you respond to anything. Your opinion is not the cure for cancer and does not need to be disseminated to the world. I know that real life can be ugly but is it possible to keep the Web beautiful?

WordPress Plugin Share Bookmark Email

I see nothing wrong with this.

          It’s time to wrap up our week on social media. We started with math and the awesomeness of a contracting world. Since the world is at your doorstep, do you greet it wearing nothing but Saran-wrap?


          Paul says: In the novel I, Robot, Earth is really over-populated but the outlying colonized planets are very sparsely occupied. Since there is so much distance between everyone on the colony, they do everything on-line. Asimov spends a good chunk of time describing the culture and mores that arise from this new remotely viewed society. They did things like chat on a video camera while nude. When face to face, where a person might touch them, they became total mysophobes and aphephobes. (For those of you who have fear of memorizing phobias, these are fear of germs and fear of human contact.)


          As a Sci-Fi geek, I have to be a fan of Asimov. He basically created the ‘robots that are your friend’ thing. Even if you think that he was a big fat arrogant blowhard, like many did, you need to give him props. He wrote I, Robot in 1950, long before the internet was a glimmer in Al Gore’s eye. Now a days, we have a whole civilization that is built and thrives around electronic communication. And with Darwinian glee, we see it becoming more and more symbiotic with every generation that passes.


          The smart parent has figured out how to use a cell phone like an electronic leash and the only price they had to pay was learning to decipher the code that has become the language of texting. This includes acronyms and putting letters together to create little symbols that become part of the text. ‘OMG I <3 u so much’ is a sentence that every parent of a 15 year old girl needs to understand.


          Not only has a language and vocabulary been created but social interactions have changed because of social media. People will take off their clothes in front of a webcam at the drop of a hat. We can meet a person, fall in love, and have sex without leaving our house. Not only is it sanctioned in our world, if done right, it can be very healthy. Obviously, a slut is a slut and dropping trou on camera for your first date is the same thing as in real life but the other part, the part where you can fall in love and become intimate with a person from afar, is very nice.


          For good or bad, social media and all of the electronic chat that comes with it are a central part of the world we live in. You can say that me and my children will never have a Facebook account but that just makes you and your children little Amish-like freaks. Or you can put your kid on Facebook at age 13 (don’t want to break any rules, now do we?) and, one day, your princess can be bait for all of the guys that Chris Hansen missed.


          The bottom line is that the technology of relationship has changed but the rules have not. We still create boundaries with people. We still watch are children around strangers and make sure that they do not wander too far away. We still get sucked into other people’s victim stories, get pissed that we are hearing the same crap over and over again, then do everything that we can to drag ourselves out of it. The only difference is that we can do it at 2 in the morning, with no clothes on, and while playing solitaire.
   

          Lee says: LOL! Paul ur so crazee. What I find interesting is the bar raising on what is precocious. Like hearing my daughter’s friend’s talk and hearing myself. However, that is me now after 20+ years of sex and debauchery. The internet is making things like losing your cyber virginity a typical Tuesday and the need to break the hymen in real life an item on a to-do list rather than a life moment. Someone needs to put the brakes on out there. Is it up to the tight assed conservatives to pray over our mother boards or do parents need to step it up and break the silence? Stop being wusses and talk to your kids. If Daddy is live-streaming midget porn, know that your son is checking out all the free pics of the same actors.

WordPress Plugin Share Bookmark Email

I am both horrified and strangely turned on by his breasts.

          The act of coupling, whether in a formal commitment such as marriage or something less rigid such as exclusive dating, is held together with expectations, promises, hope, integrity and trust. Without these factors, pairs are really playing house with Mommy’s sheets and plastic cups. Don’t believe us? Watch what happens when we throw a little permissiveness into the mix when we are discussing social media.


          Lee says: For our first anniversary, Paul and I bought our first computer. It was an IBM that cost over $2000, was the cutting edge of technology with 2MB of memory and was completely obsolete by the time we took it home. This computer was just a really big typewriter that we could load very silly games on, play solitaire and Paul could amaze me with his wicked DOS skills which he learned while he should have been dating girls.


          Since then, we have always remained on the forefront of home computer technology. Remember when ICQ was the rogue Instant Message application that the cool people used? How amazing was it that you could use your computer to type out a conversation. I was never one to have random chats but, if you know me, I rarely say no to a nice person or someone from Scotland.


          His name was Duncan. He struck up a conversation with me and I found him interesting, funny and in need of a friend. I told Paul immediately about my new Scot friend. After several conversations, Duncan turned the direction of the dialogue into something that made me uncomfortable (FIRST SIGN OF BOUNDARY CROSSING). He talked about his wife and how she was not willing to be with him intimately. I was not his therapist but I figured friends talk about this stuff so I suggested they discuss it further. He continued with this line of discussion until he crossed into how horny he was. Please note: I had had several IM conversations with him. Never once did it turn into a sex convo. I promptly told him to delete my username and I would no longer talk to him. I told Paul about it but still felt dirty. Like me, there are thousands of people having unwanted conversations. However many of them lack the forethought and boundaries to stop these conversations.


          Digital affairs are no longer a sci-fi story line. Digital affairs are alive and well in the Twitterverse and Facebookland. Reuniting with old friends or creating new relationships with strangers, people are having digital affairs without even considering their behavior as being unfaithful. One of the true beauties of social media is the ability to connect. In some cases, these connections can be very positive but with those with poor sense of self or boundaries, social media is an outlet to create a new persona and new life with new lovers and new friends, all from the comfort of your home.


          Virtual lovers/Physical Strangers are leaving their partners for something new every day. Social Media, partnered with incessant pornography viewing, is creating people yearning for passion and excitement and something different. In reality, some people need nothing more than their lap-top, internet and perhaps some lotion. The fear of love or rejection has created a new segment of society that feels they are very happy jacking off to random faces on Chat Roulette. I think I saw this episode on Twilight Zone.


          Paul says: I find it interesting how freaked out people get about their internet privacy but will give out all kinds of personal information if you just ask right. They freak out about Facebook giving away data and the holes in their security but start a chat with someone and you would be surprised at how intimate a person is willing to get if they do not need to look you in the face.


          That’s how I hunted down Duncan. I just asked a few simple questions… and pretended to be an 18-year-old female. I asked what he looked like, where he lived, and how to meet him. I asked whether or not he owned money to the Scottish mafia. He said no. I sent a computer virus and now he owes 100,000 Euros. Lee hasn’t heard from him since. Don’t fuck with my wife, you Scottish bitch!

WordPress Plugin Share Bookmark Email

© 2012 CoupleDumb.com | Masthead by Alex Camman CoupleDumb.com accepts paid advertising and paid posts but all opinions are 100% theirs. Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha